Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 114
  • Idan Landau, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
March 2013
Print publication year:
2013
Online ISBN:
9781139061858

Book description

The subject of nonfinite clauses is often missing, and yet is understood to refer to some linguistic or contextual referent (e.g. 'Bill preferred __ to remain silent' is understood as 'Bill preferred that he himself would remain silent'). This dependency is the subject matter of control theory. Extensive linguistic research into control constructions over the past five decades has unearthed a wealth of empirical findings in dozens of languages. Their proper classification and analysis, however, have been a matter of continuing debate within and across different theoretical schools. This comprehensive book pulls together, for the first time, all the important advances on the topic. Among the issues discussed are: the distinction between raising and control, obligatory and nonobligatory control, syntactic interactions with case, finiteness and nominalization, lexical determination of the controller, and phenomena like partial and implicit control. The critical discussions in this work will stimulate students and scholars to further explorations in this fascinating field.

Reviews

‘Professor Landau, already a leading contributor to the theoretical literature on control, provides here an incisive, accessible, balanced guide to what is known and what needs to be known: essential reading for anyone interested in this central area of inquiry.’

Ken Safir - Distinguished Professor of Linguistics, Rutgers University

‘Landau has written authoritatively on the issue of control, showing that deep semantic factors such as partial control have a syntactic origin. He is one of the pre-eminent experts on this issue, and I have no doubt that those who read this work, regardless of theoretical perspective, will profit from his wide-ranging knowledge of and insight into this topic.’

Mark Baltin - New York University

'[This] book is an invaluable guide for anyone interested in control. It is what one would call a 'critical survey'. It offers a complete coverage of the contexts where control is attested … [and] provides a wealth of references … The presentation is clear, detailed … [and] meticulous … Landau is an expert on the topic; his own work has helped researchers view control from a new angle, and this is evident in the book. … a useful companion for students but also for researchers. It is also relevant to anyone interested in the structure of grammar in general …'

Anna Roussou Source: Journal of Linguistics

‘A dense, technical and thoroughly argued book, CiGG [Control in Generative Grammar] will be highly useful to researchers and advanced graduate students that need to get up to speed on the details of control; whatever their specific objectives, they can be certain to find what they are looking for … Given that the phenomenon of control is inextricably linked to a host of equally prominent phenomena, CiGG should thus appeal to a wide range of researchers in formal syntax and semantics. If Landau’s exceptional achievement inspires future research companions of comparable depth on other topics aiming to tread in its footsteps, as I expect it to do, its service to the field will be even greater.'

Dennis Ott Source: LINGUIST List

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Ackema, Peter. 2002. A Morphological Approach to the Absence of Expletive PRO. In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14, Ad Neeleman and Reiko Vermeulen (eds.), 291–319. University College London.
Ackema, Peter, and Maaike Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middles and Nonmovement. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 173–197.
Adler, Allison N. 2006. Syntax and Discourse in the Acquisition of Adjunct Control. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Alba-Salas, Josep. 2006. Subject Control into Nominals in Romance. SKY Journal of Linguistics 19, 9–62.
Alboiu, Gabriela. 2007. Moving Forward With Romanian Backward Control and Raising. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), 187–211. Dordrecht: Springer.
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostpoulou. 1998. Parameterizing AGR: Word Order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491–539.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Gianina Iordăchioaia, and Mihaela Marchis. 2010. No Objections to Backward Control. In Control As Movement, Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 89–117. Cambridge University Press.
Anand, Pranav. 2006. De De se. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1977. Comments on a Paper by Wasow. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow and Adrian Akmajian (eds.), 361–377. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Andrews, Avery D. 1971. Case Agreement of Predicate Modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 127–151.
Andrews, Avery D. 1976. The VP-Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. Reprinted as Andrews (1990). In Syntax and Semantics 24: Modern Icelandic Syntax, Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.), 165–185. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.
Andrews, Avery D. 1982. The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan Bresnan (ed.), 424–503. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Andrews, Avery D. 1990. Case Structures and Control in Modern Icelandic. In Syntax and Semantics 24: Modern Icelandic Syntax, Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen (eds.), 187–234. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.
Arka, I. Wayan, and Jane Simpson. 1998. Control and Complex Arguments in Balinese. In Proceedings of the LFG98 Conference, Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publication.
Arka, I Wayan, and Jane Simpson. 2008. Objective Voice and Control Into Subject Clauses in Balinese. In Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages, Peter K. Austin and Simon Musgrave (eds.), 70–127. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Asher, Nicholas. 2000. Events, Facts, Propositions, and Evolutive Anaphors. In Speaking of Events, James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi and Achille Varzi (eds.), 123–150. Oxford University Press.
Asudeh, Ash. 2005. Control and Semantic Resource Sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 41, 465–511.
Authier, J.-Marc. 1989. Arbitrary Null Objects and Unselective Binding. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli and Ken Safir (eds.), 45–67. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Babby, Leonard H. 1998. Subject Control as Direct Predication: Evidence from Russian. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, Željko Boškovič, Steven Franks and William Snyder (eds.), 17–37. Michigan University, Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Babby, Leonard H., and Steven Franks. 1998. The Syntax of Adverbial Participles in Russian Revisited. Slavic and East European Journal 42, 117–149.
Bach, Emmon. 1979. Control in Montague Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 515–531.
Bach, Emmon. 1982. Purpose Clauses and Control. In The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Pauline Jacobson and Geffery K. Pullum (eds.), 35–57. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Bach, Emmon, and BarbaraPartee. 1980. Anaphora and Semantic Structure. In Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society 16, Jody Kreitman and Almerindo Ojeda (eds.), 1–28.
Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson, and Ian Roberts. 1989. Passive Arguments Raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 219–251.
Baltin, Mark. 2009. The Properties of Negative Non-finite Complements. In NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2: Papers in Syntax, Patricia Irwin and Violeta Vasquéz Rojas Maldonado (eds.). New York University.
Baltin, Mark, and Leslie Barrett. 2002. The Null Content of Null Case. Ms., New York University.
Baltin, Mark R. 1995. Floating quantifiers, PRO and predication. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 199–248.
Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. Null Subjects. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Barbosa, Pilar. 2009. A Case for an Agree-based Theory of Control. Ms., Universidade do Minho/CEHUM.
Barker, Chris. 2002. The Dynamics of Vagueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 1–36.
Barrie, Michael, and Christine M. Pittman. 2004. Partial Control and the Movement towards Movement. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 22, 75–92.
Barrie, Michael, and Christine M. Pittman. 2010. Mandatives: Lessons on Raising/Control Diagnostics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 55, 131–138.
Bejar, Susana, and Diane Massam. 1999. Multiple Case Checking. Syntax 2, 65–79.
Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-Verbs and Theta-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352.
Bennis, Hans. 2000. Adjectives and Argument Structure. In Lexical Specification and Insertion, Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert and Jane Grimshaw (eds.), 27–69. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Bennis, Hans. 2004. Unergative Adjectives and Psych Verbs. In Studies in Unaccusativity: The Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou and Martin Everaert (eds.), 84–113. Cambridge University Press.
Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Izvorski. 1998. Genericity, Implicit Arguments and Control. In Proceedings of SCIL 7, ed. by. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Implicit Arguments. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume 2, Martin Everaert and Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds.), 558–588. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Idan Landau. 2009. Icelandic Control is not A-movement: The Case from Case. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 113–132.
Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2003. Reply to “Control Is Not Movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 269–280.
Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2004. Movement Under Control. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 431–452.
Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2006a. The Virtues of Control as Movement. Syntax 9, 118–130.
Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2006b. Control in Icelandic and Theories of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 591–606.
Boeckx, Cedric, and Norbert Hornstein. 2007. On (Non-)Obligatory Control. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), 251–262. Dordrecht: Springer.
Boeckx, Cedric, Norbert Hornstein, and Jairo Nunes. 2010a. Icelandic Control Really Is A-Movement: Reply to Bobaljik and Landau. Linguistic Inquiry 41, 111–130.
Boeckx, Cedric, Norbert Hornstein, and Jairo Nunes. 2010b. Control as Movement. Cambridge University Press.
Bondaruk, Anna. 2004. PRO and Control in English, Irish and Polish: A Minimalist Analysis. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Bondaruk, Anna. 2006. The Licensing of Subjects and Objects in Irish Non-finite Clauses. Lingua 116, 874–894.
Bondaruk, Anna. 2008. The Case Marking of PRO in Polish Revisited. Paper presented in the 6th meeting of Generative Linguistics in Poland, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
Borer, Hagit. 1985. Anaphoric AGR. Ms., University of California, Irvine.
Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric AGR. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli and Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), 69–109. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Borsley, Robert D. 1986. Prepositional Complementizers in Welsh. Journal of Linguistics 22, 67–84.
Bošković, Željko. 1997. The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bouchard, Denis. 1984. On the Content of Empty Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bouchard, Denis. 1985. PRO, Pronominal or Anaphor. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 471–477.
Bowers, John. 1968. English Complex Sentence Formation. Journal of Linguistics 4, 83–89.
Bowers, John. 1973. Grammatical Relations. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bowers, John. 1981. The Theory of Grammatical Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bowers, John. 2008. On Reducing Control to Movement. Syntax 11, 125–143.
Brame, Michael K. 1976. Conjectures and Refutations in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Bresnan, Joan. 1972. Theory of Complementation in English Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bresnan, Joan. 1978. A Realistic Transformational Grammar. In Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan and George A. Miller (eds.), 1–60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bresnan, Joan. 1982. Control and Complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 343–434.
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Brody, Michael. 1984. On Contextual Definitions and the Role of Chains. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 355–380.
Brody, Michael, and M. Rita Manzini. 1987. Implicit Arguments. In Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, Ruth Kempson (ed.), 105–130. Cambridge University Press.
Browning, Marguerite. 1987. Null Operator Constructions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government and Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.
Carnie, Andrew, and Heidi Harley. 1997. PRO, the EPP and Nominative Case: Evidence from Irish Infinitivals. UPenn Working papers in Linguistics 4, 71–86.
Carrier-Duncan, Jill. 1985. Linking of Thematic Roles in Derivational Word Formation. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 1–34.
Castañeda, Hector-Neir. 1967. Omniscience and Indexical Reference. Journal of Philosophy 64, 203–210.
Cecchetto, Carlo, and Renato Oniga. 2004. A Challenge to Null Case Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 141–149.
Chang, Yung-Li, and Wei-tien Dylan Tsai. 2001. Actor-sensitivity and Obligatory Control in Kavalan and Some Other Formosan Languages. Language and Linguistics 2, 1–20.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1984. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds. PhD dissertation, UMASS, Amherst.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. Structured Meanings, Thematic Roles and Control. In Properties, Types and Meanings II, Gennaro Chierchia, BarbaraPartee and Raymond Turner (eds.), 131–166. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1990. Anaphora and Attitudes De Se. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas (eds.), 1–32. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chierchia, Gennaro, and Pauline Jacobson. 1986. Local and Long Distance Control. In Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistic Society 16, 57–74. UMASS (ed.): Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Choe, Hyon Sook. 2006. On (Backward) Object Control in Korean. Harvard Studies on Korean Linguistics XI, Kiyunggi Publishing Company, 373–386.
Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Ms., MIT. Published by Plenum Press, New York, 1975.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1968. Language and Mind. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on Transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Reprinted in Noam Chomsky (ed.) (1977), Essays on Form and Interpretation, 81–160. New York, NY: North-Holland.
Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Condition on Rules of Grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2, 303–351.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York, NY: North-Holland.
Chomsky, Noam. 1980. On Binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 1–46.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michels and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 425–504.
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The Theory of Principles and Parameters. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), 506–569. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Clark, Robin. 1990. Thematic Theory in Syntax and Interpretation. London: Routledge.
Clements, George N. 1975. Super-Equi and the Intervention Constraint. In Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of North Eastern Linguistic Society, 13–28. UMASS (ed.), Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Comorovski, Ileana. 1985. Control and Obviation in Romanian. In Proceedings of Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Choi Soonja, Dan Devitt, Wynn Janis, Terry McCoy and Zheng-Sheng Zhang (eds.), 47–56. Ohio State University.
Comrie, Bernard. 1974. The Second Dative: A Transformational Approach. In Slavic Transformational Syntax, Michigan Slavic Materials No. 10, Richard Brecht and Catherine Chvany (eds.), 123–150. Michigan University Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1984. Subject and Object Control: Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Claudia Brugmanet al. (eds.), 450–464. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Constantini, Francesco, and Vasselina Laskova. 2009. Remarks on PROarb. In University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 19, Laura Brugè (ed.), 61–79. University of Venice.
Cormack, Annabelle, and Neil Smith. 2004. Backward Control in Korean and Japanese. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16, 57–83.
Cornilescu, Alexandra. 2003. Complementation in English: A Minimalist Approach. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
Culicover, Peter W., and Wendy Wilkins. 1986. Control, PRO, and the Projection Principle. Language 62, 120–153.
Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff. 2001. Control is not Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 493–512.
Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff. 2006. Turn Over Control to Semantics. Syntax 9, 131–152.
Cutrer, Michelle L. 1993. Semantic and Syntactic Factors in Control. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, Robert D. Van Valin (ed.), 167–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Czepluch, Hartmut. 1982. Case Theory and the Dative Construction. The Linguistic Review 2, 1–38.
Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Darzi, Ali. 2008. On the VP Analysis of Persian Finite Control Constructions. 39, 103–115.
Davies, William D. 1988. The Case Against Functional Control. Lingua 76, 1–20.
Davies, William D. 2005. Madurese Control. K@ta 7, 1–12.
Davies, William D., and Stanley Dubinsky. 2004. The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. PhD dissertation, MIT.
den Dikken, Marcel. 1995a. Binding, Expletives and Levels. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 347–354.
den Dikken, Marcel 1995b. Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions. Oxford University Press.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2001. Head-to-Head Merge in Balkan Subjunctives and Locality. In Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, María Luisa Rivero and Angela Ralli (eds.), 44–73. Oxford University Press.
Dowty, David. 1985. On Recent Analyses of the Semantics of Control. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 291–331.
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic Proto Roles and Argument Selection. Language 67, 547–619.
Dowty, David, and Pauline Jacobson. 1988. Agreement as a Semantic Phenomenon. In Proceedings of ESCOL 5, Joyce Powers and Kenneth de Jong (eds.), 95–108. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Dubinsky, Stanley, and Shoko Hamano. 2007. A Window into the Syntax of Control: Event Opacity in Japanese and in English. In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, Anastasia Conroy, Chunyuan Jing, Chizuru Nakao and Eri Takahashi (eds.), 75–92. College Park, MD: UMPiL, University of Maryland.
Duffley, Patrick J. 2000. Gerund vs. Infinitive as Complement of Transitive Verbs in English: The Problems of “Tense” and “Control”. Journal of English Linguistics 28, 221–248.
Enç, Mürvet. 1990. On the Absence of the Present Tense Morpheme in English. Ms., University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Engelhardt, Miriam. 1999. Nominalization and Control. In Papers on Morphology and Syntax, Cycle Two, Vivian Lin, Cornelia Krause, Benjamin Bruening and Karlos Arregi (eds.), 191–211. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Epstein, Samuel. 1984. Quantifier-pro and the LF Representation of PROARB. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 499–505.
Español-Echevarría, Manuel. 1998. The Syntax of Purposive Expressions. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Evers, Arnold. 1988. Non-finite Verb Forms and Subject Theta Role Assignment. In Morphology and Modularity: In Honor of Henk Schultink, Martin Everaert, Arnold Evers, Riny Huybregts and Mieke Trommelen (eds.), 105–128. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Falk, Yehuda. 2006. Subjects and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
Faraci, Robert. 1974. Aspects of the Grammar of Infinitives and For-Phrases. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Farkas, Donca. 1985. Obligatorily Controlled Subjects in Romanian. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, William H. Eilfort, Paul D. Kroeber and Karen L. Peterson (eds.), 90–100. University of Chicago.
Farkas, Donca F. 1988. On Obligatory Control. Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 27–58.
Farrell, Patrick. 1993. The Interplay of Syntax and Semantics in Complement Control. In Proceedings of SALT 3, Utpal Lahiri and Adam Wyner (eds.), 57–76. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Farrell, Patrick. 1995. Backward Control in Brazilian Portuguese. In Proceedings of the 94th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Janet M. Fuller, Ho Han and David Parkinson (eds.), 116–127. Ithaca, NY: Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.
Ferreira, Marcelo. 2009. Null Subjects and Finite Control in Brazilian Portuguese. In Minimalist Essays on Brazilian Portuguese Syntax, Jairo Nunes (ed.), 17–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, Janet D. 1974. Like Subject Verbs and Causal Clauses in English. Journal of Linguistics 10, 95–110.
Fodor, Jerry A. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Franks, Steven. 1990. Case, Configuration and Argumenthood: Reflections on the Second Dative. Russian Linguistics 14, 231–254.
Franks, Steven. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franks, Steven. 1998. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax Revisited: A Minimalist Retrospective. In Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, Željko Boškovič, Steven Franks and William Snyder (eds.), 134–165. Michigan University, Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Fujii, Tomohiro. 2006. Some Theoretical Issues in Japanese Control. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Fujii, Tomohiro. 2010. Split Control and the Principle of Minimal Distance. In Movement Theory of Control, Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 211–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fukuda, Shinichiro. 2008. Backward Control. Language and Linguistics Compass 2, 168–195.
Gair, James W. 2005. Some Aspects of Finiteness and Control in Sinhala. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Rajendra Singh and Tanmoy Bhattacharya (eds.), 117–143. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gallego, Ángel J., and Juan Uriagereka. 2007. Conditions on Sub-extraction. In Coreference, Modality, and Focus, Luis Eguren and Olga Fernández Soriano (eds.), 45–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ghomeshi, Jila. 2001. Control and Thematic Agreement. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46, 9–40.
Giorgi, Alessandra, and Giuseppe Longobardi. 1991. The Syntax of Noun Phrases: Configuration, Parameters and Empty Categories. Cambridge University Press.
Greenberg, Gerald R. 1983. Another Look at the Second Dative and Related Subjects. Linguistic Analysis 11, 167–218.
Greenberg, Gerald R. 1989. Dative Subjects and the Second Dative Within Slavic. Digest for Philology and Linguistics 32, 45–57.
Greenberg, Gerald R., and Steven Franks. 1991. A Parametric Approach to Dative Subjects and the Second Dative in Russian. Slavic and East European Journal 35, 71–97.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grimshaw, Jane, and Armin Mester. 1988. Light Verbs and Theta-marking. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 205–232.
Grinder, John T. 1970. Super Equi-NP Deletion. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 297–317. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society (ed.).
Grinder, John T. 1971. A Reply to Super Equi-NP Deletion as Dative Deletion. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 101–111. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society (ed.).
Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung, and Lisa Travis. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian Languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10, 375–414.
Gutman, Eynat. 2004. Third Person Null Subjects in Hebrew, Finnish and Rumanian: An Accessibility-theoretic Account. Journal of Linguistics 40, 463–490.
Haddad, Youssef A. 2007. Adjunct Control in Telugu and Assamese. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainsville.
Haddad, Youssef A. 2009. Copy Control in Telugu. Journal of Linguistics 45, 69–109.
Haik, Isabelle. 1984. Indirect Binding. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 185–223.
Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In The View From Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harada, Shin-Ichi. 1973. Counter Equi-NP Deletion. University of Tokyo Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics Annual Bulletin 7, 113–147.
Harley, Heidi. 2000. Irish, the EPP and PRO. Ms., University of Arizona, Tuscon.
Hashemipour, Peggy. 1988. Finite Control in Modern Persian. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics, Hagit Borer (ed.), 115–128. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Helke, Michael. 1971. The Grammar of English Reflexives. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Hellan, Lars. 1980. On the Logical Form of Infinitives and Gerunds. In Proceedings of NELS 10, J. Jensen (ed.), 191–212. University of Ottawa: Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa.
Herbeck, Peter. 2011. Overt Subjects in Spanish Control Infinitives and the Theory of Empty Categories. Generative Grammar in Geneva 7, 1–22.
Higginbotham, James. 1980. Pronouns and Bound Variables. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 679–708.
Higginbotham, James. 1992. Reference and Control. In Control and Grammar, Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri and James Higginbotham (eds.), 79–108. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Holmberg, Anders, Aarti Nayudu, and Michelle Sheehan. 2009. Three Partial Null-Subject Languages: A Comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi. Studia Linguistica 63, 59–97.
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 69–96.
Hornstein, Norbert. 2001. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hornstein, Norbert. 2003. On Control. In Minimalist Syntax, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 6–81. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Hornstein, Norbert, and David Lightfoot. 1987. Predication and PRO. Language 63, 23–52.
Hornstein, Norbert, and Hirohisa Kiguchi. 2003. PRO-gate and Movement. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Sudha Arunachalam, Elsi Kaiser and Alexander Williams (eds.), 101–114. University of Pennsylvania.
Hornstein, Norbert, and Paul Pietroski. 2010. Obligatory Control and Local Reflexives: Copies as Vehicles for De se Readings. In Movement Theory of Control, Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 67–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hornstein, Norbert, and Maria Polinsky (eds.). 2010a. Control as Movement: Across Languages and Constructions. In Movement Theory of Control, Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hornstein, Norbert, and Maria Polinsky. 2010b. Movement Theory of Control. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1989. Pro-Drop in Chinese: A Generalized Control Theory. In The Null Subject Parameter, OsvaldoJaeggli and KennethJ. Safir (eds.), 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hudson, Richard. 2003. Case Agreement, PRO and Structure Sharing. Research in Language 1, 7–33.
Huettner, Alison K. 1989. Adjunct Infinitives in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Hust, Joel R., and Michael K. Brame. 1976. Jackendoff on Interpretive Semantics. Linguistic Analysis 2, 243–277.
Iatridou, Sabine. 1988. On Nominative Case Assignment and a Few Related Things. Ms., MIT. Reprinted in Papers on Case and Agreement II (1993), Colin Phillips (ed.), MITWPL 19, 175–196. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Imaoka, Ako. 2011. Scrambling out of a Control Clause in Japanese: An Argument against the Movement Theory of Control. UPENN Working Papers in Linguistics 17, 145–154.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1974. A Deep Structure Projection Rule. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 481–506.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 369–412.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray, and Peter W. Culicover. 2003. The Semantic Basis of Control in English. Language 79, 517–556.
Jacobson, Pauline. 1992. Raising Without Movement. In Control and Grammar, Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri and James Higginbotham (eds.), 149–194. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jacobson, Pauline, and Paul Neubauer. 1976. Rule Cyclicity: Evidence from the Intervention Constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 429–462.
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1986. Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 582–622.
Jaeggli, Osvaldo, and Kenneth J. Safir. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli and Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), 1–44. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Janke, Vikki. 2008. Control Without a Subject. Lingua 118, 82–118.
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. University of Chicago Press (1992).
Jones, Charles. 1991. Purpose Clauses: Syntax, Thematics and Semantics of English Purpose Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jordan, Maria. 2010. Does Romanian Exhibit Backward Control? Ms., University of Florida.
Joseph, Brian. 1983. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive. Cambridge University Press.
Karimi, Simin. 2008. Raising and Control in Persian. In Aspects of Iranian Linguistics, Simin Karimi, Donald Stilo and Vida Samiian (eds.), 177–208. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative Verbs. Language 47, 340–358.
Kato, Mary, and Esmeralda V. Negrão. 2000. Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt: Vervuert-Iberoamericana.
Kawasaki, Noriko. 1989. Jibun-tachi and Non-coreferential Anaphora. In Papers on Quantification, UMASS (ed.), Amherst.
Kawasaki, Noriko. 1993. Control and Arbitrary Interpretation in English. PhD dissertation, UMASS.
Kayne, Richard S. 1981. On Certain Differences Between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–371.
Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kayne, Richard S. 1991. Romance Clitics, Verb Movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–686.
Kertz, Laura. 2010. The Argument Structure of Evaluative Adjectives: A Case of Pseudo-raising. In Movement Theory of Control, Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 269–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kiguchi, Hirohisa. 2000. PRO-Gate and Movement. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
Kimball, John P. 1971. Super Equi-NP Deletion as Dative Deletion. In Papers from the 7th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 142–148. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society (ed.).
Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Progress in Linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Heidolph (eds.), 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.
Kirby, Susannah, William D. Davies, and Stanley Dubinsky. 2010. Up to D[eb]ate on Raising and Control. Language and Linguistics Compass 4, 390–416.
Kiss, Tibor. 2004. On the Empirical Viability of the Movement Theory of Control. Ms., Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1982. Variables and the Bijection Principle. The Linguistic Review 2, 139–161.
Koster, Jan. 1984. On Binding and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 417–459.
Koster, Jan. 1987. Domains and Dynasties. Dordrecht: Foris.
Koster, Jan, and Robert May. 1982. On the Constituency of Infinitives. Language 58, 117–143.
Kotzoglou, George, and Dimitra Papangeli. 2007. Raising or Control in Greek: Not really ECM, Not Exactly Control: The “Quasi ECM” Construction in Greek. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), 111–131. Dordrecht: Springer.
Krapova, Iliyana. 2001. Subjunctives in Bulgarian and Modern Greek. In Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages, María Luisa Rivero and Angela Ralli (eds.), 105–126. Oxford University Press.
Krapova, Iliyana, and Vassil Petkov. 1999. Subjunctive Complements, Null Subjects and Case Checking in Bulgarian. In Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of Formal Approach to Slavic Linguistics, Katarzyna Dziwirek, Herbert Coats and Cynthia M. Vakareliyska (eds.), 267–285. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1997. Impersonal Pronouns and Logophoricity: A talk given at Sinn and Beteutung 2, Berlin.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40.
Kroeger, Paul. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kuno, Susumu. 1975. Super Equi-NP Deletion is a Pseudo-Transformation. In Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistic Society 5, 29–44. UMASS (ed.), Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Kuroda, Shige-Yike. 1978. Case-marking, Canonical Sentence Patterns and Counter-Equi in Japanese. In Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics, John Hinds and Irwin Howard (eds.), 30–51. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Kwon, Nayoung, Philip J. Monahan, and Maria Polinsky. 2010. Object Control in Korean: A Backward Control Impostor. In Movement Theory of Control, Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 299–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ladusaw, William A. 1977. Super Equi NP Deletion and the Direct Discourse Analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 742–744.
Ladusaw, William A. 1987. Inference Patterns From Infinitival Complements. In Proceedings of WCCFL 6, Megan Crowhurst (ed.), 163–171. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Ladusaw, William A., and David Dowty. 1988. Toward a Non-grammatical Account of Thermatic Roles. In Thematic Relations, Wendy Wikins (ed.), 62–74. New York: Academic Press.
Landau, Idan. 1999. Psych-Adjectives and Semantic Selection. The Linguistic Review 16, 333–358.
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Landau, Idan. 2001. Control and Extraposition: The Case of Super-Equi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 109–152.
Landau, Idan. 2002. (Un)interpretable Neg in Comp. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 465–492.
Landau, Idan. 2003. Movement Out of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 471–498.
Landau, Idan. 2004. The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22, 811–877.
Landau, Idan. 2006. Severing the Distribution of PRO from Case. Syntax 9, 153–170.
Landau, Idan. 2007. Movement-Resistant Aspects of Control. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising. William D. Davies and StanleyDubinsky (eds.), 293–325. Dordrecht: Springer.
Landau, Idan. 2008. Two Routes of Control: Evidence from Case Transmission in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26, 877–924.
Landau, Idan. 2009. Saturation and Reification in Adjectival Diathesis. Journal of Linguistics 45, 315–361.
Landau, Idan. 2010a. The Explicit Syntax of Implicit Arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 41, 357–388.
Landau, Idan. 2010b. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Langendoen, Terence D., and Edwin I. Battistella. 1982. The Interpretation of Predicate Reflexive and Reciprocal Expressions in English. In Proceedings of NELS 12, James Pustejovsky and Peter Sells (eds.), 163–173. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Larson, Richard. 1991. Promise and the Theory of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 103–139.
Lasnik, Howard. 1988. Subjects and the Theta-Criterion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 1–17.
Lasnik, Howard. 1992. Two Notes on Control and Binding. In Control and Grammar, Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri and James Higginbotham (eds.), 235–251. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lasnik, Howard, and Robert Fiengo. 1974. Complement Object Deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 535–572.
Lawler, John. 1972. A Problem in Participatory Democracy. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Lebeaux, David. 1984. Anaphoric Binding and the Definition of PRO. In Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistic Society 14, Charles Jones and Peter Sells (eds.), 253–274. UMASS, Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Lebeaux, David. 1985. Locality and Anaphoric Binding. The Linguistic Review 4, 343–363.
Lee, Felicia. 2003. Anaphoric R-expressions as Bound Variables. Syntax 6, 84–114.
Lee, Kum Young. 2009. Finite Control in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Iowa.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Pragmatics and the Grammar of Anaphora: A Partial Pragmatic Reduction of Binding and Control Phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23, 379–434.
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters and Problems. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), 562–603. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Lyngfelt, Benjamin. 1999. Optimal Control: An OT Perspective on the Interpretation of PRO in Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 63, 75–104.
Lyngfelt, Benjamin. 2000. OT Semantics and Control. Ms., Göteborg University.
Madigan, Sean. 2008a. Control Constructions in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.
Madigan, Sean. 2008b. Obligatory Split Control into Exhortative Complements in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry 39, 493–502.
Manzini, M. Rita. 1983. On Control and Control Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 421–446.
Manzini, M. Rita. 1986. On Control and Binding Theory. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of North Eastern Linguistic Society, Stephen Berman, Joe-Woong Choe and Joyce McDonough (eds.), 322–337. UMASS: Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Manzini, M. Rita, and Anna Roussou. 2000. A Minimalist Theory of A-movement and Control. Lingua 110, 409–447.
Martin, Roger A. 1996. A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Martin, Roger A. 2001. Null Case and the Distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 141–166.
McCawley, James D. 1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago University Press.
McCloskey, James. 1980. Is There Raising in Modern Irish?Ériu 31, 59–99.
McCloskey, James. 1985. Case, Movement and Raising in Modern Irish. In Proceedings of WCCFL 4, Jeffrey Goldberg, Susannah Mackaye and Wescoat Michael (eds.), 190–205. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.
McCloskey, James. 1996. Subjects and Subject Positions in Irish. In The Syntax of the Celtic Languages: A Comparative Perspective, Robert D. Borsley and Ian Roberts (eds.), 241–283. Cambridge University Press.
McCloskey, James, and Peter Sells. 1988. Control and A-Chains in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 143–189.
McFadden, Thomas. 2004. The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax-Morphology Interface. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
McFadden, Thomas. 2005. The Distribution of Subjects in Non-finite Clauses: An Account without Case. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Sudha Arunachalam, Tatjana Scheffler, Sandhya Sundaresan and Joshua Tauberer (eds.). University of Pennsylvania.
Melvold, Janis. 1985. Getting PRO Under Control. Ms., MIT.
Mensching, Guido. 2000. Infinitive Constructions with Specified Subjects: A Syntactic Analysis of the Romance Languages. Oxford University Press.
Mittwoch, Anita. 1976. Raising or Equi or Both: Another Look at Root Modals and at Permissive Allow. Papers in Linguistics 10, 55–75.
Modesto, Marcello. 2007a. Inflected Infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese as an Argument Both Contra and in Favor of a Movement Analysis of Control. Revista Letras 72, 297–307.
Modesto, Marcello. 2007b. Null Subjects in Brazilian Portuguese and Finnish: They are Not Derived by Movement. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), 231–248. Dordrecht: Springer.
Modesto, Marcello. 2010a. What Brazilian Portuguese Says About Control: Remarks on Boeckx & Hornstein. Syntax 13, 78–96.
Modesto, Marcello. 2010b. Control Structures With Inflected Infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese. Ms., Universidade de São Paulo.
Modesto, Marcello. 2011. Finite Control: Where Movement Goes Wrong in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 10, 3–30.
Mohanan, K. P. 1982. Infinitival Subjects, Government and Abstract Case. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 323–327.
Mohanan, K. P. 1983. Functional and Anaphoric Control. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 641–674.
Mohanan, K. P. 1985. Remarks on Control and Control Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 637–648.
Monahan, Philip J. 2003. Backward Object Control in Korean. In Proceedings of WCCFL 22, Gina Garding and Mimu Tsujimura (eds.), 356–369. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Monahan, Philip J. 2005. Backward Object Control in Korean. Ms., University of Maryland.
Morgan, Jerry L. 1970. On the Criterion of Identity for Noun Phrase Deletion. In Proceedings of CLS 6, Mary Ann Campbellet al. (eds.), 380–389. Chicago University Press.
Müller, Gereon. 1998. Incomplete Category Fronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant Movement in German. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nadahalli, Jayashree. 1998. Aspects of Kannada Grammar. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Narita, Hiroki. 2007. Counter Equi “NP”-trace Pronunciation. In Proceedings of the 4th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics, Yoichi Miyamoto and Massao Ochi (eds.), 185–196. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Ndayiragije, Juvénal. 2012. On Raising Out of Control. Linguistic Inquiry 43, 275–299.
Neidle, Carol. 1982. Case Agreement in Russian. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan Bresnan (ed.), 391–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neidle, Carol Jan. 1988. The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Neubauer, Paul. 1972. Super-Equi revisited. In Proceedings of the Eighth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 287–293. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society (ed.).
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1984. Control and the Thematic Domain. Language 60, 215–250.
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
O’Neil, John H. 1997. Means of Control: Deriving the Properties of PRO in the Minimalist Program. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Oh, Sunseek. 1988. A Promising Control Theory. In Proceedings of CLS 24, Lynn Maclead, Gary Larson and Diane Brentari (eds.), 290–303. Chicago University Press.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe. 1997. An Account of Implicit Complement Control in English and German. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, Marjolijn Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee and Eve Sweetser (eds.), 417–432. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Klaus-Michael Köpcke. 1993. A Cognitive Approach to Obligatory Control Phenomena in English and German. Folia Linguistica 27, 57–105.
Partee, Barbara. 1975. Deletion and Variable Binding. In Formal Semantics of Natural Languages, Edward Keenan (ed.), 16–34. Cambridge University Press.
Pearson, Matthew. 2005. The Malagasy Subject as an Ā-element. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23, 381–457.
Perlmutter, David M. 1970. The Two Verbs Begin. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Peter Rosenbaum and Roderick Jacobs (eds.), 107–119. Waltham, MA: Ginn-Blaisdell.
Pesetsky, David. 1991. Zero Syntax II: An Essay on Infinitives. Ms., MIT.
Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2001. T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Petter, Marga. 1998. Getting PRO Under Control. LOT International Series, Vol. 8. The Hague: HIL, Holland Academic Graphics.
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1987. The Theory of Empty Categories and the Pro-drop Parameter in Modern Greek. Journal of Linguistics 23, 289–318.
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene, and Georgia Catsimali. 1999. On Control in Greek. In Studies in Greek Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Geoffrey C. Horrocks and Melita Stavrou (eds.), 153–167. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pires, Acrisio. 2007. The Derivation of Clausal Gerunds. Syntax 10, 165–203.
Polinsky, Maria. 2007. Object Control in Korean: Obligatory vs. Non-Obligatory Control. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47, Barbara Stiebels (ed.), 197–217.
Polinsky, Maria, and Eric Potsdam. 2002. Backward Control. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 245–282.
Polinsky, Maria, and Eric Potsdam. 2003. Backward Control: Evidence from Malagasy. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 19, 173–187.
Polinsky, Maria, and Eric Potsdam. 2006. Expanding the Scope of Control and Raising. Syntax 9, 171–192.
Pöll, Bernhard. 2007. On the Licensing of Overt Subjects in Spanish Infinitival Clauses. Probus 19, 93–120.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.
Postal, Paul M. 1970. On Coreferential Complement Subject Deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 439–500.
Postal, Paul M. 1974. On Raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Postal, Paul M. 2004. Skeptical Linguistics Essays. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Potsdam, Eric. 2009. Malagasy Backward Object Control. Language 85, 754–784.
Przepiórkowski, Adam, and Alexandr Rosen. 2005. Czech and Polish Raising/Control with or without Structure Sharing. Research in Language 3, 33–66.
Pustejovsky, James. 1988. The Geometry of Events. In Studies in Generative Approaches to Syntax: Lexcon Project Papers 24, Carol Tenny (ed.), 19–40. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quicoli, Antonio C. 1982. The Structure of Complementation. Ghent-Antwerp-Brussels: E. Story-Scientia Gent.
Rackowski, Andrea, and Norvin Richards. 2005. Phase Edge and Extraction: A Tagalog Case Study. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 565–599.
Raposo, Eduardo. 1987. Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: The Inflected Infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 85–109.
Reed, Lisa. 2010. Control Can't Be a Fact. Ms., The Pennsylvania State University.
Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657–720.
Reuland, Eric. 2006. Logophoricity. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume 3, Martin Everaert and Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds.), 1–20. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Reuland, Eric J. 1983. Governing -ing. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 101–136.
Richards, Norvin. 2000. Another Look at Tagalog Subjects. In Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics, Ileana Paul, Vivianne Phillips and Lisa Travis (eds.), 105–116. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Richardson, John F. 1986. Super-Equi and Anaphoric Control. In Proceedings of the 22nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Anne M. Farley, Peter T. Farley and Karl-Erik McCullough (eds.), 248–261. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Rigau, Gemma. 1995. The Properties of the Temporal Infinitive Constructions in Catalan and Spanish. Probus 7, 279–301.
Rivero, María Luisa. 1994. Clause Structure and V-movement in the Languages of the Balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12, 63–120.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Comments on Chomsky's Chapter “On the Representation of Form and Function”. In Perspectives on Mental Representations: Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Cognitive Processes and Capacities, Jacques Mehler, Edward C. T. Walker and Merrill Garrett (eds.), 441–451. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986a. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 501–557.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986b. On Chain Formation. In Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Hagit Borer (ed.), 65–95. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rochette, Anne. 1988. Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Romance Sentential Complementation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Rodrigues, Cilene. 2004. Impoverished Morphology and A-movement out of Case Domains. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Rodrigues, Cilene. 2007. Agreement and Flotation in Partial and Inverse Partial Control Configurations. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), 213–229. Dordrecht: Springer.
Roeper, Thomas. 1987. Implicit Arguments and the Head-Complement Relation. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 267–310.
Roeper, Thomas. 1993. Explicit Syntax in the Lexicon: The Representation of Nominalizations. In Semantics and the Lexicon, James Pustejovsky (ed.), 185–220. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Roeper, Thomas. 2000. Inherent Binding and the Syntax/Lexicon Interface: Distinguishing DP, NP, and N. In Lexical Specification and Insertion, Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert and Jane Grimshaw (eds.), 305–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rooryck, Johan. 1992. On the Distinction Between Raising and Control. In Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory, Paul Hirschbühler and Konrad Koerner (eds.), 225–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rooryck, Johan. 2000. Configurations of Sentential Complementation: Perspectives from Romance Languages. London: Routledge.
Rooryck, Johan. 2007. Control via Selection. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, William D. Davies and Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), 281–292. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rosenbaum, Peter. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rosenbaum, Peter. 1970. A Principle Governing Deletion in English Sentential Complementation. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), 220–229. Waltham, MA: Ginn-Blaisdell.
Ross, John R. 1969. On the Cyclic Nature of English Pronominalization. In Modern Studies in English, David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane (eds.), 187–200. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Roussou, Anna. 2001. Control and Raising in and out of Subjunctive Complements. In Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages, María Luisa Rivero and Angela Ralli (eds.), 74–104: Oxford University Press.
Roussou, Anna. 2009. In the Mood for Control. Lingua 119, 1811–1836.
Runner, Jeffrey T. 2006. Lingering Challenges to the Raising-to-Object and Object-Control Constructions. Syntax 9, 193–213.
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1972. Théorie Syntaxique et Syntaxe du Français. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Ruys, Eddy. 1994. A Global Economy Analysis of Weak Crossover. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994, Reineke Bok-Bennema and Crit Cremers (eds.), 223–234. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Růžička, Rudolph. 1983. Remarks on Control. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 309–324.
Safir, Ken. 1984. Multiple Variable Binding. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 603–638.
Safir, Ken. 1987. The Syntactic Projection of Lexical Thematic Structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 561–601.
Safir, Ken. 1991. Evaluative Predicates and the Representation of Implicit Arguments. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, Robert Freidin (ed.), 99–131. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Safir, Ken. 1996. Derivation, Representation and Resumption: The Domain of Weak Crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 313–339.
Safir, Ken. 2004. The Syntax of (In)dependence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Safir, Ken. 2010. PRO and De se. Ms., Rutgers University.
Sag, Ivan, and Carl Pollard. 1991. An Integrated Theory of Complement Control. Language 67, 63–113.
San-Martin, Itziar. 2004. On Subordination and the Distribution of PRO. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
San-Martin, Itziar. 2000. Control in Basque. In Proceedings of WCCFL 19, Roger Billerey and Brook Danielle Lillehaugen (eds.), 425–438. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Sato, Yosuke. 2011. On the Movement Theory of Control: Voices from Standard Indonesian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 56, 267–275.
Saxon, Leslie. 1984. Control and Agreement in Dogrib. In Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Gloria Alvarez, Belinda Brodie and Terry McCoy (eds.), 128–139. Ohio State University.
Saxon, Leslie. 1989. Control and Control Verbs: Two Sources of “Control Effects”. In Proceedings of WCCFL 8, Jane E. Fee and Katherine Hunt (eds.), 347–357. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Schachter, Paul. 1976. The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, Actor-topic, or None of the Above. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 491–518. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Schein, Barry. 1982. Nonfinite Complements in Russian. In Papers in Syntax: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 4, Alec Marantz and Tim Stowell (eds.), 217–243. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Schlenkar, Philippe. 2003. A Plea for Monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 29–120.
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 445–480.
Sells, Peter. 2006. Using Subsumption Rather Than Equality in Functional Control. In Proceedings of the LFG 2006 Conference, Miriam Butt and Tracy H. King (eds.). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Sharvit, Yael. 2008. The Puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 31, 353–395.
Shlonsky, Ur. 1992. Resumptive Pronouns as a Last Resort. Linguistic Inquiry 23, 443–468.
Shlonsky, Ur. 2009. Hebrew as a Partial Null Subject Language. Studia Linguistica 63, 1–25.
Sichel, Ivy. 2009. New Evidence for the Structural Realization of the Implicit External Argument in Nominalizations. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 712–723.
Sichel, Ivy. 2010. Towards a Typology of Control in DP. In Movement Theory of Control, Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 245–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sigurðsson, Halldór A. 1991. Icelandic Case-Marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 327–363.
Sigurðsson, Halldór A. 2002. To be an Oblique Subject: Russian vs. Icelandic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 691–724.
Sigurðsson, Halldór A. 2008. The Case of PRO. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26, 403–450.
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2002. The Synchrony and Diachrony of Romance Infinitives With Nominative Subjects. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2007. Romance Infinitives With Subjects, Subjunctive Obviation and Control Theory. In Coreference, Modality, and Focus, Luis Eguren and Olga Fernández-Soriano (eds.), 191–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Słodowicz, Szymon. 2007. Complement Control in Turkish. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47, 125–157.
Słodowicz, Szymon. 2008. Control in Polish Complement Clauses. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.
Sportiche, Dominique. 2010. Menace Under the Microscope: The Two Verbs menacer and the Theory of Control. In Structure Preserved: Studies in Syntax for Jan Koster, Jan-Wouter Zwart and Mark de Vries (eds.), 329–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stephenson, Tamina. 2010. Control in Centred Worlds. Journal of Semantics, 409–436.
Stiebels, Barbara. 2007. Towards a Typology of Complement Control. In Studies in Complement Control: ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics 47, Barbara Stiebels (ed.), 1–80.
Stockwell, Robert P., Paul Schachter, and Barbara Hall Partee. 1973. The Major Syntactic Structures of English. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Stowell, Tim. 1982. The Tense of Infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 561–570.
Stowell, Tim. 1991. The Alignment of Arguments in Adjective Phrases. In Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Suzan Rothstein (ed.), 105–135. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Sundaresan, Sandhya. 2010. A Reductionist Treatment of Control and Anaphora: To appear in a special issue of Scientific Cyprus Journal on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Kleanthes Grohmann (ed.).
Sundaresan, Sandhya, and Thomas McFadden. 2009. Subject Distribution in Tamil and Other Languages: Selection vs. Case. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 2, 5–34.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2009. Overt Nominative Subjects in Infinitival Complements: Data, Diagnostics, and Preliminary Analyses. In NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2: Papers in Syntax, Patricia Irwin and Violeta Vasquéz Rojas Maldonado (eds.). New York University.
Takano, Yuji. 2010. Scrambling and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 41, 83–110.
Tallerman, Maggie. 1998. The Uniform Case-licensing of Subjects in Welsh. The Linguistic Review 15, 69–133.
Terzi, Arhonto. 1992. PRO in Finite Clauses: A Study of the Inflectional Heads of the Balkan Languages. PhD dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, NY.
Terzi, Arhonto. 1997. PRO and Null Case in Finite Clauses. The Linguistics Review 14, 335–360.
Thomason, Richmond H. 1974. Some Complement Constructions in Montague Grammar. In Proceedings of CLS 10, M. LaGafyet al. (eds.), 712–722. Chicago University Press.
Thomason, Richmond H. 1976. Some Extensions of Montague Grammar. In Montague Grammar, BarbaraPartee (ed.), 77–118. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. New York, NY: Garland Press.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1986. On Auxiliaries, Aux and VPs in Icelandic. In Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, Lars Hellan and Kristi Koch Christensen (eds.), 235–265. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1993. On the Structure of Infinitival Complements. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 3, Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel D. Epstein and Susumu Kuno (eds.), 181–213. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Torrego, Esther. 1998. Nominative Subjects and Pro-drop INFL. Syntax 1, 206–219.
Tóth, Ildikó. 2000. Inflected Infinitives in Hungarian. PhD dissertation, TILDIL, Tilburg University, Tilburg.
Travis, Lisa. 1999. Theta-Positions and Binding in Balinese and Malagasy. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 43, 435–467.
Ussery, Cherlon. 2008. What it Means to Agree: The Behavior of Case and Phi Features in Icelandic Control. In Proceedings of WCCFL 26, Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie (eds.), 480–488. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
van Urk, Coppe. 2011. Visser's Generalization: A Window into the Syntax of Control. Ms., MIT.
Varlokosta, Spyridoula. 1993. Control in Modern Greek. In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 1, Carol A. Mason, Susan M. Powers and Cristina Schmitt (eds.), 144–163.
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse. 1985. Lexical Subjects in French Infinitives. In Selected Papers from 13th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Larry D. King and Catherine A. Malay (eds.), 407–423. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wagner, K. Heinz. 1968. Verb Phrase Complementation: A Criticism. Journal of Linguistics 4, 88–92.
Wasow, Thomas, and Thomas Roeper. 1972. On the Subject of Gerunds. Foundations of Language 8, 44–61.
Whelpton, Matthew. 2001. Elucidation of a Telic Infinitive. Journal of Linguistics 37, 313–337.
Whelpton, Matthew. 2002. Locality and Control with Infinitives of Result. Natural Language Semantics 10, 167–210.
Wilkinson, Robert. 1971. Complement Subject Deletion and Subset Relations. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 575–584.
Wilkinson, Robert. 1976. Modes of Predication and Implied Adverbial Complements. Foundations of Language 14, 153–194.
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.
Williams, Edwin. 1985. PRO and Subject of NP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 297–315.
Williams, Edwin. 1987. Implicit Arguments, the Binding Theory and Control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 151–180.
Williams, Edwin. 1991. The Argument-Bound Empty Categories. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, Robert Freidin (ed.), 77–98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, Edwin. 1992. Adjunct Control. In Control and Grammar, Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri and James Higginbotham (eds.), 297–322. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Witkoś, Jacek. 2007. On Certain Aspects of Control in CP-infinitives in Polish. Paper Presented at FDSL 7, University of Leipzig.
Witkoś, Jacek. 2008. Control and Predicative Adjectives in Polish. In Elements of Slavic and Germanic Grammars: A Comparative View, Jacek Witkoś and Gisbert Fanselow (eds.), 255–277. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Witkoś, Jacek. 2010. Movement Theory of Control and CP-infinitives in Polish. In Movement Theory of Control, Norbert Hornstein and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 45–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Witkoś, Jacek. 2011. Subject Control Across and Object and the Extended Late Merge Hypothesis. Paper presented at the 42nd Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
Witkoś, Jacek, and Anna Snarska. 2009. On Partial Control and Parasitic PC Effects. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 5, 42–75.
Wood, Jim. 2012. Against the Movement Theory of Control: Another Argument from Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 43, 322–330.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2002. Semantic vs. Syntactic Control. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, Jan Wouter Zwart and Werner Abraham (eds.), 93–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2011. Tense and Aspect in English Infinitives. Ms., University of Connecticut.
Wyngaerd, Guido J. vanden. 1994. PRO-legomena. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Xu, Leijiong. 1986. Towards a Lexical-Thematic Theory of Control. Linguistic Review 5, 345–376.
Yang, Dong-Whee. 1985. On the Integrity of Control Theory. In Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistic Society 15, Stephen Berman, Jae-Woong Choe and Joyce McDonough (eds.), 389–408. UMASS: Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Yoshimoto, Keisuke. 2011. Japanese tokoro-clause Constructions Do Not Involve Backward Control. Ms., University of Essex.
Zec, Draga. 1987. On Obligatory Control in Clausal Complements. In Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure, Iida Masayo, Steven Wechsler and Draga Zec (eds.), 139–168. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.